![]() A single footnote in the “Statement of Facts” also indicates that prosecutors have more evidence than explicitly outlined in the charging documents. Yet conspiracy wasn’t listed as a separate count in the indictment - something Bragg said Tuesday prosecutors are allowed to do at this stage. Instead, prosecutors filed a 44-paragraph “Statement of Facts” that has the unmistakable flavor of a conspiracy case - the word “scheme” appears eight times. A firm answer to that important question, however, is found nowhere in the indictment. ![]() The big question on the minds of many was what legal hook prosecutors would use to elevate what would normally be considered misdemeanors to felonies. But does any of it amount to an actual crime, especially one the district attorney’s office can prove beyond a reasonable doubt? The court papers now finally unsealed lay bare allegations of checks, check stubs, invoices and even a thank you dinner at the White House, all in service of a plot - according to prosecutors - to suppress stories that could hurt Trump’s 2016 presidential prospects. Prosecutors had uncovered “additional evidence,” according to District Attorney Alvin Bragg, that breathed new life into the zombie once again. Trump, falsified New York business records in order to conceal an illegal conspiracy to undermine the integrity of the 2016 presidential election and other violations of Election Laws.” In court Tuesday, prosecutor Chris Conroy offered a succinct theory of the case: “The defendant, Donald J. But the falsification of business records alone isn’t enough - that falsification needed to be done with the intent to conceal another crime in order to elevate what’s typically a misdemeanor state charge to a felony. ![]() The likelihood of prosecutors bringing a charge of falsifying of business records was well reported.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |